Today I think we are in tecnology age and internet is first thing we use . As you now there are so many sites and they can be created easily . And people share whatever they want in their site . Sometimes it can be beneficial for us . But sometimes they consist of nonsense and harfmul things . To control every site is so difficult and sometimes goverment ban them . I think it is true because today so many people use net and especially children . They use net for games but while they using , they can enter these sites and learb bad , immorality things because parents can't control them everytime . So it is radical to ban but to ban a site for politic ideas is not true . At least for a country that is democratic , it can't be accepted .

Internet is one of the most important thing in our age and many people use it for different things and for downloading music or films . And especially these days it is a matter whether it should be right or not . I think that it must be illegal . The first reason is that it is stealing to download something without permit of their owner . We should pay money because they need money . They don't create these things just for fun . They pay money to their employment ,too . And for this they should have money that they gain from us . Also while downloading , we don't respect the owners . Because they work so hard but we don't pay anything . İt is injustice I think . However there are some people who oppose this idea . They don't think it is a crime . They say that the cost of albums is so high and this way is so cheap . Also they say that it is easy and quick . Lastly they say that they are so rich already and don't need the money we pay . Of course there are some points that is true but all of them can't be a reason for stealing something . We shouldn't forget that the thing that given effort can't be payment .

Thesis statement:So many people prefer downloading music or films from net for free rather than buying their original . I bet they are right a bit because of cost .
Supporting idea 1:Sometimes pepole can't have any other choises because of economic reasons.
Supporting idea 2:Most of people say that it is easy and quick .
Opposing idea 1:People don't pay any money while downloading these things and it is stealing and crime .
Opposing idea 2:People don't respect singers or components 's effort becuse they don't give anything to them .
Refutation of opponents's ideas:Although it is easy and quick , it is not an excuse for this stealing . because they gives so much effort to create their product and they should have something for this .

As you know there are so many universities in our country and some of them use English as main language for their lessons . But is it good or bad ? We should think carefully this . I think it is so nonsense thing because we are living in Turkey and Turkish is our main language . So they don't have to use English instead of Turkish . Some people say that it is good because their English is improving . Actually it is true but I think only for foreign language students . They learn english very well in high school and they don't have trouble . But what about others ? They don't learn english like others and they cab have so many problems in university because they can't understand clearly lessons , teachers . And I don't think that they learn lessons well . Also their Turkish is begining to go to dry day by day and eventually , they can be unsuccesful both language . I think that they should learn the lessons in Turkish . Because they will work in Turkey for the future and their language must be good , fluent . If they go to the foreign country , then they can learn english but not in university .

The former passage as you see says that people should have the right to die . But I don't agree to this idea . Firstly , they say that the cost is so high . But health is more important than money or anything else . How can we kill someone because we don't have money . Do you think is it humanness ? And this problem can be solved . They are charities and they can go to there or they can made campaing and find money .
Secondly , they say that when there is no change of recovery , they can be killed . But medical science is developing day by day and everday boffins find new things . So we can't know what will happen in the future . And everytime , there is a hope .
Thirdly , thay say that it is so difficult caring them . But parents have to take care of them because they are child of them and they themself make up their choises and they want to have a child . So thay can't throw them . Therefore , they have to do this .

The Right to Die
A difficult problem that is facing society is euthanasia, another word for mercy killing. Thousands of young people are mortally ill because of incurable disease. They are all kept alive in artificial ways. They have no chance to recover completely, but most of the legal systems do not allow doctors to end their lives. However, fatally ill patients should be allowed to die for several reasons.
The first reason is that medical costs are very high. The cost of a hospital room can be as much as a hundred dollars per day and even more. The costs of medicines and medical tests are also high. The family of the patient is responsible for these expenses. Consequently, they would be a terrible financial burden for them for a long time.
The second reason is that the family suffers. The nurses can only give the terminally ill patient minimum care. The family must spend time to care for the special needs of their loved one. They should talk, touch, and hold the patient even though he or she may be in a coma. For example, Karen Quinlan’s parents visited her every day even though she was unable to speak or to see. Also, it is very difficult to watch a loved one in a coma because his or her condition does not improve.
The third and most important reason is that the patients have no chance of recovery. They can never lead normal lives and must be kept alive by life – support machines. They may need a machine to breathe and a feeding tube to take in food. They are more dead than alive and will never get better. For example, in 1975, Karen Quinlan became unconscious after the she swallowed some drugs and drank alcohol. She was kept alive by machines. Her parents knew that her body and brain would never be normal. Therefore, they asked the court to allow their daughter to die. The judge agreed, and Karen’s breathing machine was turned off. She was able to breathe on her own, but she died nine years later in June of 1985.
In conclusion, because terminally ill patients have no chance to live normal lives, they should be allowed to die with dignity. Therefore, the family should have the right to ask to turn off the life-support machines or to stop further medical treatment.

There are so many university students in our country and of course there are lessons that they attend . But sometimes they don't want to attend the lessons . So what will they do then ? Some people say that students should attend the lessons because they say that in homes there are things which busy them . Television , internet are some of them . And onether thing that they say is good learning . They mean that ıf students attend the lessons , they can understand them better . And they say that via this they can get used to easily their friends and they can be social people . but I don't agree all these things . Sometimes there can be important things in their lifes . For example , their relatives may be die or become ill . What will they do then ? In these times , they will want to quit the lessons . So they should have right for not attending the lessons . And lastly , they are young people and they want to different things in their life . Going to school everytime can be so boring sometimes . And maybe they feel better when they don't attend the lessons. But of course the students shouldn't exaggerate . Because then most of them don't come to school and they can be unsuccesful . Shortly , ıf we think all of these things , they should attend the lessons but they should have a few free days .

Thesis stament : University students should to attend the class I think
Reason for 1 : If a student attend to lesson , he/she can learn better because attend to lesson in activity style is so important . Otherwise I don't believe that they can study on their own in home or dormitory . Because always there is something in these places that can be busy them . Television , internet or something else .
Reason for 2 :In class atmosphere , a student can learn better with their friends because every one has a different idea and this is more beneficial . There is something to say , ıf a student don't attend the class , he/she has to work more ı think . Because a teacher can teach easily with his/her works.
Reasons against : Those who disagree may say that sometimes the students don't want to attend the lesson and they can have some problem . So they should be more free about this .
Refutation of opponent 's argument : If they have prıblem , they can solve this in their home . They should not skip the lesson . Otherwise , they can be lazy and unsuccessful .

In our lesson , we discussed that which education is more efficient ? Face to face education or internet education ? I suppose the face to face education . Because I believe that our people exaggerate the using of net and some of them can use it badly or useless . Also I believe that the control of net is more difficult because everything can be done with only one click . I think that the education that has activenes is more permanent . I mean that ıf a child attend the lesson by using something , he / she can understand better . For example , in primary school we were using abacus and bean for numbers . With these I could the lesson more easily . Like this ıf we have visual things that we can touch , ıt will be more beneficial .

In Second Life I visited two different places and I will tell about their sameness and differences . The left image belongs to a recreation ground . The right image belongs to a shopping mall . Actually , they have not so much sameness I think . Only sameness which they have is that both of them are a place which people go to most of the time . However they have many differences. Firstly, the left image has a sea on the contrary onether one has a aquarium . Secondly ,the left one is outdoor but onether is indoor . Thirdly , their colours are so different . The recreation ground has light colour although the shopping mall has dark colour . And lastly the first picture has sofas that you can sit but second pictures there aren't any sofas . That's all....